Maize (Zea Mays L.) is most widely distributed crop and ranks third in world crop production while I India. It is regarded as an important food grain, feed and fodder crop. More than sixty species of insects have been reported to attack maize crop during its different stages of growth. (Anon. 1998. Among the different insect pests, stem borer species associated with maize in India are Chilo partellus swinhoe and Sesamia inferens walker commonly known as pink borer. Losses due to S. inferens which is a major pest during post rainly season I south India, varied from 25.7 to 78.9%. Panwar (1998) reported the infestation of the maize stalk borer  (Chilo partelllus) throughout India during rainy season while S.inferens only in peninsular India during winter season as serious pest causing grain yield losses ranging from 18.0 to 49.0% (Anon., 1998, and Anon., 1999). Because of higher grain yield losses, research efforts are being initiated to develop resistant hybrids at Agricultural Research Station (Maize), Amberpet, Hyderabad, since it is most efficient and permanent means of controlling the pest. Screening of all the elite germplasm was undertaken in the present investigation as a first phase of resistance breeding programme and to identify the highly resistant donor parents under natural conditions for their future use in hybrid breeding programme.

One hundred and thirty two elite inbreds consisting of lines developed from CIMMYT introductions and recycled lines developed from Indian origin with two checks (Basi local as susceptible check and DHM105 as resistant check sown at regular frequency of 20 rows of test entries) were sown in rows of 5 m length in simple lattice design with two replications during rabi 2000-2001. A spacing of 75 cm between rows and 20 cm between plants was adopted. Hyderabad center is considered as one of the hot spot during winter season for the incidence of S.inferens. Therefore, no artificial inoculations were attended. For ensuring greater exposure to the pest infestation highly susceptible check Basi local was sown as spreader row at regular interval along with resistant check DHM 105 for comparison. Mean data on per cent of leaf damage, dead hearts and number of plants damaged in each genotype were reordered replication wise on whole plot basis at 25 days old seedling stage. Grain yields obtained plot-1were also recorded for all the genotypes. The pest incidence was quantified as per the scale (1-9 rating scale) suggested (Anon., 1999), where 1-3 rating scale as resistant, >3-6 as moderately susceptible and  >6-9 as susceptible. Results were analyzed as suggested by Panse and Sukatme(1961).

The incidence of pink borer damage over two replications found significant in 132 elite inbreds known for their good agronomic and desirable plant characters. The intensity of S. inferens infestation among the genotypes ranged from 1.20 (Entry No: 681) to 8.95 (Entry No., 762) with each 42 inbred lines grouped as resistant and moderately susceptible and another 48 genotypes as susceptible. The average incidence rating of these tree groups were recorded as 2.25, 4.95 and 7.85 respectively where as resistant check (DHM 105) and susceptible check (Basi local) recorded as 1.85 and 8.85 respectively. Higher infestation among the genotypes during the early growth stage is attributed to the sowing of highly susceptible check at regular interval, which helped and served as spreader rows. It also created a congenial atmosphere for easy establishment of larvae in the fields.

Among the resistant group genotypes, entry number viz., 655,660,662,673,675,681,684,686,691 and 718 recorded lower incidence rating (1.20-2.00) coupled with higher grain yield were considered as potential parents for resistance breeding programme (Table 1). Entry number 681 and 691 recorded the lowest incidence rating of 1.20 and 1.25 and with maximum grain yield of 7,840 and 8,000 kg ha1respectively; hence these genotypes may be used as donar parents in the hybrid breeding programme after conformation. These results confirming the observations of the earlier reports (Satyanarayana and Sai Kumar, 1995., Satyanarayana, 1995., Koteswara Rao et al., 1991 and Anon., 1998).

Entry NoPedigreePest Incidence
Rating (1 to 9)
Grain Yield
(Kg ha-1)
655AML-1552.006,240
660AML-1602.006,720
662AML-1621.507,520
673AML-1731.507,680
675AML-1752.006,480
681AML-1811.207,840
684
AML-1841.857,146
686AML-1862.006,746
691AML-1911.258,000
718AML-2181.657,600
Resistant checkDHM-1051.85
Susceptible checkBasilocal8.855,333
762(Highly susceptible entry)AML-2628.954,933

LITERATURE CITED

Anonymous, 1998. Annual Progress Report, Directorate of Maize research, Cunning Laboratory, IARI, New Delhi.

Anonymous, 1999. Annual progress Report, Directorate of Maize Research, Cunning Laboratory, IARI, New Delhi.

Koteswara Rao, G.,E.Satyanarayana and R.Bener Raj.1991. Potential inbreds and management of Turcicum leaf blight and charcoal rot of Maize. In plant Disease Problems in Central India (Edn. K.Muralidharan and C.S. Reddy), Indian Phytopath. Soc. pp. 20-22.

Panse, V.S. and P.V. Sukatme, 1961.Statistical methods for Agricultural workers 2nd Edn. ICAR, New Delhi.

Satyanarayana, E. 1995. Genetic studies of late wilt and Turcicum leaf blight resistance in Maize, Madras agric. J., 82(11): 608-609.

Satyanarayana, E. and R.Sai Kumar,1995. Studies on shoot fly resistance in maize. Current., 24: 206-208.

E.Satyanarayana ,  P.Shanthi,  R.Sai Kumar

Agricultural Research Station(Maize), Amberpet, Hyderabad-500013 (India)